Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency svelte to v5.56.4#194

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/svelte-5.x
Open

chore(deps): update dependency svelte to v5.56.4#194
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/svelte-5.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
svelte (source) 5.56.35.56.4 age confidence

Release Notes

sveltejs/svelte (svelte)

v5.56.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • fix: include wrapping parentheses in {@​const} declarator end position (#​18436)

  • fix: always unset reactivity context after restoring it (#​18453)

  • fix: don't notify searchParams subscribers when the URL changes without affecting the search string (#​18425)

  • fix: strip ? from optional parameters in <script lang="ts"> so generated JavaScript is valid (#​18448)


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Asia/Bangkok)

  • Branch creation
    • "every weekend"
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
coding-stats Error Error Jun 27, 2026 1:42am

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/svelte-5.x branch from 7d297ab to 6d102b6 Compare June 27, 2026 01:42
@renovate

renovate Bot commented Jun 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: pnpm-lock.yaml
? Verifying lockfile against supply-chain policies (650 entries)...
Progress: resolved 1, reused 0, downloaded 0, added 0
Progress: resolved 21, reused 0, downloaded 0, added 0
Progress: resolved 28, reused 0, downloaded 0, added 0
Progress: resolved 31, reused 0, downloaded 0, added 0
Progress: resolved 35, reused 0, downloaded 0, added 0
Progress: resolved 39, reused 0, downloaded 0, added 0
Progress: resolved 41, reused 0, downloaded 0, added 0
Progress: resolved 45, reused 0, downloaded 0, added 0
Progress: resolved 46, reused 0, downloaded 0, added 0
[WARN] Request took 11447ms: https://registry.npmjs.org/typescript
Progress: resolved 47, reused 0, downloaded 0, added 0
[WARN] Request took 11868ms: https://registry.npmjs.org/@typescript-eslint%2Fparser
[WARN] Request took 12501ms: https://registry.npmjs.org/@typescript-eslint%2Feslint-plugin
Progress: resolved 49, reused 0, downloaded 0, added 0
Progress: resolved 50, reused 0, downloaded 0, added 0
✗ Lockfile failed supply-chain policy check (650 entries in 14.7s)
[ERR_PNPM_MINIMUM_RELEASE_AGE_VIOLATION] 1 lockfile entries failed verification:
  prettier@3.8.5 was published at 2026-06-26T12:58:13.266Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-06-26T01:42:03.800Z)

The lockfile contains entries that the active policies reject. This can mean the lockfile is stale, or that someone committed a lockfile that bypassed the policy locally — inspect recent changes to pnpm-lock.yaml before trusting it. If the changes look expected, run "pnpm clean --lockfile" and then "pnpm install" to rebuild from a fresh resolution. Alternatively, relax the policy that flagged them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant