Skip to content

fix(ebounty.lic): v1.11.2 properly set start_room on script startup#2383

Open
mrhoribu wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/ebounty-v1.11.2
Open

fix(ebounty.lic): v1.11.2 properly set start_room on script startup#2383
mrhoribu wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/ebounty-v1.11.2

Conversation

@mrhoribu

@mrhoribu mrhoribu commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updated version to 1.11.2 and added new feature for start room ID.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Fixed an issue where the start room ID was not set correctly in certain cases.
    • The script now initializes the start room ID when a current room is available, helping ensure progression starts from the right location.
    • Updated the release version information to reflect the latest patch.

Updated version to 1.11.2 and added new feature for start room ID.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This change updates scripts/ebounty.lic to version 1.11.2, adding a changelog entry, and introduces logic to set EBounty.data.start_room to Room.current.id when the current room ID is not nil during script initialization.

Changes

EBounty start room fix

Layer / File(s) Summary
Set start room and version bump
scripts/ebounty.lic
Adds a nil-guarded assignment of EBounty.data.start_room from Room.current.id and bumps script version to 1.11.2 with a corresponding changelog entry.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly matches the main change: updating ebounty.lic to v1.11.2 and initializing start_room at startup.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/ebounty-v1.11.2

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@mrhoribu

mrhoribu commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
scripts/ebounty.lic (1)

3702-3707: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | 💤 Low value

Now-redundant start_room assignments.

With the unconditional guard added at Lines 3666-3669, these duplicate Room.current.id.nil? checks and start_room assignments in the nil, once and remove branches are redundant (start_room is already set moments earlier). Not incorrect, just duplicated logic that could be simplified.

Also applies to: 3744-3750

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@scripts/ebounty.lic` around lines 3702 - 3707, The duplicate
Room.current.id.nil? guard and EBounty.data.start_room assignment in the
nil/once and remove branches are now redundant because start_room is already set
by the earlier unconditional check. Simplify those branches in ebounty.lic by
removing the repeated nil check and assignment, and keep only the
branch-specific behavior while still referencing Room.current.id and
EBounty.data.start_room consistently.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Nitpick comments:
In `@scripts/ebounty.lic`:
- Around line 3702-3707: The duplicate Room.current.id.nil? guard and
EBounty.data.start_room assignment in the nil/once and remove branches are now
redundant because start_room is already set by the earlier unconditional check.
Simplify those branches in ebounty.lic by removing the repeated nil check and
assignment, and keep only the branch-specific behavior while still referencing
Room.current.id and EBounty.data.start_room consistently.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d118fa39-6ea0-4902-8dc6-cbe9d0ae5927

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 24f4426 and 83a5e51.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • scripts/ebounty.lic

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant