Skip to content

docs: TRADEMARK.md + certification-mark policy (#341)#5

Merged
gsavastano merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
gsavastano/trademark-policy
Jun 27, 2026
Merged

docs: TRADEMARK.md + certification-mark policy (#341)#5
gsavastano merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
gsavastano/trademark-policy

Conversation

@gsavastano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backfills the #341 P0 guard for this public repo (same policy as the interop kit PR).

  • TRADEMARK.md — content is Apache-2.0; Apache §6 grants no mark rights; forks must rename; "OpenDPP-conformant" reserved for output validated against the hosted node. Claims-honest (the OpenDPP product is not open-source).
  • NOTICE — expand the existing trademark line with the EUTM + a policy pointer; fix casing OpenDPP UABOpendpp UAB.
  • README — License & trademark pointer.

⚠️ Merge-order dependency: TRADEMARK.md is repo-owned meta, but the OKF mirror (opendpp-node/.github/workflows/okf-publish.yml) rsyncs with --delete and would wipe it. The backend guards PR (#342/#346) adds --exclude 'TRADEMARK.md'merge that before/with this, or the next OKF sync deletes this file. Draft until then.

Add a trademark & conformance policy now that @opendpp/* packages are public:
content is Apache-2.0, Apache §6 grants no mark rights, forks must rename, and
"OpenDPP-conformant" is reserved for output validated against the hosted node.
Claims-honest: scopes "open" to THIS repo's content and states the OpenDPP product
is not open-source. Link it from README + the NOTICE trademark line; fix the
entity-name casing (OpenDPP UAB -> Opendpp UAB, the registered company).
TRADEMARK.md is repo-owned meta (no OKF frontmatter, GitHub-relative links), like
README/NOTICE — add it to REPO_META so the OKF conformance check skips it instead of
demanding concept frontmatter.
@gsavastano gsavastano marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2026 18:46
@gsavastano gsavastano merged commit eb9641d into main Jun 27, 2026
2 checks passed
@gsavastano gsavastano deleted the gsavastano/trademark-policy branch June 27, 2026 21:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant